Product
A vault for the matter. An intelligence inside it.
CaseGenie holds the entire record of a matter in a single bounded vault — every document, every email, every filing, every exhibit, every deposition, every transcript — and reads it as one body of evidence rather than as fragments. Tenant-isolated, scoped to one matter, preserved indefinitely.
Each matter is its own vault. There is no cross-matter pool, no shared state, and no path by which one matter’s documents or analysis reaches another. A firm with twelve matters has twelve separate vaults.
Inside the vault, the architecture reads the record, integrates it as a whole, and produces a Case Intelligence Report — chronology, entities, contradictions, gaps, and theories the record can support, with every claim tethered to source.
Before Harvey. Before CoCounsel. Before you open a chat window.
Already have those tools? Good — you’ll still use them. They draft, research, and answer prompts from a theory you already brought. CaseGenie is a different category, and it comes first: upload the raw record, supply no framing, and the architecture surfaces the theories the evidence itself supports — each one pinned to the document that proves it. The theory is an output, not an input.
See it on real cases
Four working sample cases are publicly accessible. Each is a complete document set that has been ingested through the architecture, with chronology, entities, theories, and the rendered Case Intelligence Report all visible. They are the most direct inspection of what the architecture actually does:
- Rivera v. Orange Lantern Health Systems — employment retaliation, 26 documents
- Kaplan v. Vandamm International — partnership dissolution and fraud
- Martinez v. Gray Mountain Insurance — personal injury and insurance bad faith
- Santos v. Orange Lantern Apartments — landlord-tenant habitability
What the system produces
For each matter, the system reads the documents and writes an integrated analytical record. The deliverable is a Case Intelligence Report — a structured artifact synthesizing the work of the analytical layer:
Chronology
A timeline of events derived from the documents themselves, with each event linked to the source documents that establish it. Built by reading the record, not by user framing.
Entities and relationships
Every person, organization, and instrument referenced in the documents, with their roles and the relationships among them — including the ones that emerge only when the record is read as a whole.
Contradictions and admissions
Statements in one document that contradict statements in another. Admissions that cut against the position of the party making them. Surfaced as findings, with both sides of the contradiction tethered to source.
Evidence gaps
The places where a theory the record could support is missing the evidence needed to carry it — named directly, with discovery suggestions for closing the gap.
Theories the record supports
Legal theories generated from the evidence rather than supplied by the user, with the evidentiary support for each theory enumerated and the strength of that support characterized.
Source-tethered citations
Every analytical claim in the report cites the documents that support it. Provenance is preserved through every layer of the system.
How a matter moves through the system
1. Upload
Documents go directly into a tenant-isolated vault. No description, no theory, and no framing are supplied to the analytical layer at ingestion. This is the touchless-ingestion property described in the working papers.
2. Ingest
The system reads the record. A five-phase pipeline — chunk, analyze, merge, cross-reference, theorize — operates against the entire vault as a coherent whole.
3. Report
The Case Intelligence Report is generated. Chronology, entities, contradictions, gaps, and theories are written into the structured artifact, ready for review.
4. Query
The analytical layer remains available for stateless queries against the vault. Each query is independent of every prior query — no conversation history is transmitted, no prior framing accumulates.
5. Lock
Analytical conclusions can be locked once reviewed. Subsequent ingestions do not modify locked content automatically; instead, a proposed-update record is written, preserving the locked work product and putting the user on notice.
Confidentiality of users
CaseGenie does not publish, name, or logo-strip the firms, attorneys, or pro se litigants who use the system. Identity of users is treated as a confidentiality property at the same boundary that protects evidence: the system is bounded against external disclosure of who is inside it, not only of what is inside it.
The same principle applies to testimonials, case studies, and reference calls. None are solicited or published. Counsel evaluating CaseGenie may contact the founder directly to discuss fit, scope, and architectural questions; the conversation does not become a marketing surface.
After the free pages
Beyond your free pages, you pay only for what you use, by the page. Pages are purchased in the app and assigned to a matter. They do not expire, do not transfer between matters, and carry no subscription or monthly fee. A matter that goes quiet costs nothing to keep; resume it whenever the work resumes.
Analysis cost grows with the record, because Genie re-reads the entire vault every run. A larger record is a deeper read.
The architecture is the product
CaseGenie does not depend on a single foundation model. The intelligence layer uses the best available model at the time of access and can improve as better models become available. The architecture remains constant; the underlying engine can change.
A matter ingested today is analyzed through today’s model capability. The same matter, queried later, is read through whatever model is then best available. There is no premium tier, no advanced-model surcharge, no version negotiation; as the field improves, every active matter improves with it.
The vault stays. The intelligence sharpens.
Begin
To start a matter, create your account and proceed to intake. Upload the document set; the system handles the rest. Your first 30 pages and first analysis are free.
Evaluation, demo, or enterprise
Counsel evaluating CaseGenie for a specific matter, firms considering multi-matter use, in-house teams assessing fit, and academic researchers seeking access for study are welcome to write directly.